Add this page to Favorites





  Health Information Center  :  C  :  Carotid Artery Disease

 Special Filter is Key to New Treatment for Blocked Neck Arteries

 


A minimally invasive procedure to clear plaque-filled neck arteries is as effective as traditional surgery in patients at high risk for open surgery, according to new Cleveland Clinic-led research. The minimally invasive treatment uses a stent in combination with a special filter to catch any emboli, or bits of plaque, that break free during the procedure.

"Our findings indicate that for patients with coexisting disease, such as coronary artery disease or heart failure, carotid stenting with embolic protection is an excellent treatment option," said lead researcher Jay Yadav, M.D., Director of Vascular Intervention at the Cleveland Clinic.

"Because many patients with carotid artery disease have other conditions that make them poor candidates for surgery, it’s important that we find safe, effective alternatives in order to better manage their disease and reduce their risk of stroke," said Dr. Yadav, who helped to design the filter used in the study.

The SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy) study is the first study to compare carotid stenting with embolic protection to traditional open surgery to clear clogged neck arteries and restore blood flow to the brain in high-risk surgical patients. The traditional surgery, called a carotid endarterectomy, is considered the current "gold standard" for treating carotid stenosis.

In people with carotid stenosis, plaque builds up and narrows the carotid arteries. Similar to the process by which arteries in the heart become blocked and cause a heart attack, untreated carotid stenosis can cut off blood supply to the brain, causing a stroke.

Unlike the traditional surgery, which involves cutting open the carotid arteries to clean them, carotid artery stenting is a minimally invasive procedure that does not require a large, open incision. Carotid stenting involves feeding a stent, a wire mesh device used to open a narrowed artery, up to the neck through a catheter near the leg. This process can cause small pieces of plaque to break off and enter the bloodstream.

To reduce the chance of this, SAPPHIRE researchers used an emboli-protection device to catch these small particles. The device, which looks like a tiny umbrella, is opened in the artery above the placement of the stent. Once the stent is in place and deployed, the emboli-protection device is collapsed and removed with the trapped particles inside.

The SAPPHIRE study included 334 high-risk patients at 29 treatment centers around the United States. Patients were randomly assigned to a procedure only if caregivers agreed the patient was a suitable candidate for either stenting or endarterectomy. Of the 167 patients randomly assigned to stenting, 159 received the assigned treatment. Of the 167 patients assigned to surgery, 151 received the assigned treatment. The primary end point of the study was the rate of major adverse events, defined as death, stroke or heart attack within 30 days of the procedure, or death or stroke between 31 days and one year following the procedure.

Of the patients assigned to stenting, 20 of the 167 experienced a major adverse event vs. 32 of the 167 assigned to surgery. The rate of major adverse events was 39 percent lower among patients randomly assigned to protected carotid-artery stenting. Rates of bleeding complications were similar, but the length of hospital stay was longer in the patients assigned to surgery. These findings show that for high-risk patients, the less invasive stent treatment is at least as effective as surgery.

"We are excited to have found a comparable alternative for surgery in high-risk patients," said Kenneth Ouriel, M.D., division chairman of surgery and department chairman of vascular surgery at The Cleveland Clinic. "This should make a big difference in patient management in the future."

Complete study results appear in the October 7, 2004 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine. Funding for the study came in part from Cordis, a unit of Johnson & Johnson, which manufactures and markets the stents and emboli-protection devices used in the trial.








Health Encyclopedia Contacts

 

Health Information Center